False carbon dating examples

14 Feb

In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.This skews the 'real' answer to a much younger age.You can find some further good information here: -- read the full page if you get the chance.At least to the uninitiated, carbon dating is generally assumed to be a sure-fire way to predict the age of any organism that once lived on our planet.The C-12 is a very stable element and will not change form after being absorbed; however, C-14 is highly unstable and in fact will immediately begin changing after absorption.

I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.Despite this she continually uses the c14 dates to create 'absolute' chronologies.She says this is ok so long as you take into account the correction factors from dendrochronology.And this big sequence is then used to 'correct' C14 dates. (3.) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without a knowledge of the exact ratio of C12 to C14 in the initial sample, the dating technique is still subject to question.(4.) Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay.